Page 1 of 1

Categories of "relation status" in xDima2

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 1:29 pm
by Bernd Welter
Hi folks,

for demonstration purposes I calculated a dima with some special coinstraints:
  • 5 locations somewhere on the German island Sylt
  • A custom bounding rectangle which "excludes" the point in the far east
  • Violations allowed
dima challenge 1.png
I wanted to demonstrate that the dima is complete (5x5 relations) and splits the relations into 3 categories:
  • relation routed successful, without violations
  • relation routed successful, with violations
  • relation not routed successful, therefore estimated by direct distance
dima challenge 2.png
What surprises me: the point in the far east contributes with:
  • 3 times without violations
  • 2 times violated
  • 3 times estimated by direct distance
How can this be? I expected the location to be "unreachable" from a symmetric perspective.
Bernd

Re: Categories of "relation status" in xDima2

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 7:38 am
by Bernd Welter
OK, that was a tricky one - probably doesn't occur in reality ;-)
sylt.jpg
  • The isolated coordinate in the east (green pin) is linked to the closest segment (green star) that touches the rectangle's border.
  • That particular road is a oneway street which
    • enables the router to leave the place
    • but prevents him from reaching the eastern point
Thanks for the analysis, Frank!

That being said I recommend that you also check this article "xServer2: Handling of optimization on islands such as Sylt, Helgoland, ..." carefully if you are interested in "spatial" challenges ;-)

Bernd