Hi,
new 2021_cards are considering the restrictions on B169 between Cottbus and Senftenberg.
Thanks,
Sebastian
Search found 12 matches
- Wed Dec 09, 2020 12:24 pm
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Blocked Road (B169) is used
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13867
- Thu Feb 27, 2020 11:44 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Blocked Road (B169) is used
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13867
Re: Blocked Road (B169) is used
Hi Bernd,
any news about this?
Thanks & Regards,
Sebastian
any news about this?
Thanks & Regards,
Sebastian
- Mon Dec 16, 2019 11:18 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Blocked Road (B169) is used
- Replies: 6
- Views: 13867
Blocked Road (B169) is used
Hi Bernd ( and colleagues),
we faced a new 'problem'.
Some colleagues gave me a hint, that the B169 between Cottbus and Senftenberg is used although it`s blocked for trucks since March 2019.
https://www.lr-online.de/lausitz/cottbus/laermschutz-fuer-anwohner-bundesstrasse-b169-ab-montag-fuer ...
we faced a new 'problem'.
Some colleagues gave me a hint, that the B169 between Cottbus and Senftenberg is used although it`s blocked for trucks since March 2019.
https://www.lr-online.de/lausitz/cottbus/laermschutz-fuer-anwohner-bundesstrasse-b169-ab-montag-fuer ...
- Thu Sep 19, 2019 7:35 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Routing through a tunnel with extra toll
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3435
Re: Routing through a tunnel with extra toll
Hi Joost,
ok for me!
We solved this 'problem', there was a misunderstanding by using the parameters in the correct order ( our mistake).
Thanks,
Sebastian
ok for me!
We solved this 'problem', there was a misunderstanding by using the parameters in the correct order ( our mistake).
Thanks,
Sebastian
- Wed Aug 28, 2019 6:12 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Routing through a tunnel with extra toll
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3435
Re: Routing through a tunnel with extra toll
any idea about this?
- Thu Aug 08, 2019 8:08 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Routing with a submarine? :-)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4124
Re: Routing with a submarine? :-)
Hi Joost,
thanks for your detailed reply and further actions.
To make sure that no side effects occur, i will relocate the coordinate to a point more left (as recommended).
Thanks!
Regards,
Sebastian
thanks for your detailed reply and further actions.
To make sure that no side effects occur, i will relocate the coordinate to a point more left (as recommended).
Thanks!
Regards,
Sebastian
- Wed Aug 07, 2019 11:27 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Routing through a tunnel with extra toll
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3435
Routing through a tunnel with extra toll
Hi,
another problem (or mistake in my own configuration).
We enabled the Basic Data Rules/Toll/extraTollMalus,
but there is no difference within the result, when the values are changed (-99,2500,2501)
coordinates: request.PNG
Extra Toll: extra_toll.PNG
xml-snippet: xml_snippet.xml
Thanks ...
another problem (or mistake in my own configuration).
We enabled the Basic Data Rules/Toll/extraTollMalus,
but there is no difference within the result, when the values are changed (-99,2500,2501)
coordinates: request.PNG
Extra Toll: extra_toll.PNG
xml-snippet: xml_snippet.xml
Thanks ...
- Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:22 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Routing with a submarine? :-)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4124
Re: Routing with a submarine? :-)
Hi,
but the routing is possible, green baloon declares the start, red declares the end.
We get no error,
within our profile.xml i declared isDelivery as "true"...
Regards,
Sebastian
but the routing is possible, green baloon declares the start, red declares the end.
We get no error,
within our profile.xml i declared isDelivery as "true"...
Regards,
Sebastian
- Wed Aug 07, 2019 8:27 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Routing with a submarine? :-)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4124
Routing with a submarine? :-)
Good morning,
actually we face a problem with another routing where a non-existing 'whatever' will be used.
we had a problem with another route some time ago, PTV has eliminated this problem within the actual Europe-Premium 2019.2H, currently we are using the .1H version.
maybe this is a further ...
actually we face a problem with another routing where a non-existing 'whatever' will be used.
we had a problem with another route some time ago, PTV has eliminated this problem within the actual Europe-Premium 2019.2H, currently we are using the .1H version.
maybe this is a further ...
- Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:36 am
- Forum: PTV xRouteServer / DEV.Routing API
- Topic: Ferry used which doesn`t exists
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2699
Ferry used which doesn`t exists
Good morning,
it seems the xRoute is using a ferry, which doesn`t exists since a long time (screenshot 1).
There is a plan when the maps will be updated?
At the moment we are fixing this error with a via-point nearby the correct ferry (screenshot 2).
Thanks & Regards,
Sebastian
it seems the xRoute is using a ferry, which doesn`t exists since a long time (screenshot 1).
There is a plan when the maps will be updated?
At the moment we are fixing this error with a via-point nearby the correct ferry (screenshot 2).
Thanks & Regards,
Sebastian